
Fundamental analysis: Dominos Pizza, Inc. (DPZ)
Awarener score: 5.8
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Average), the business stability (Average) and growth (Very poor), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Very good).
Note: All scores range from 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Conclusions are updated daily with closing stock prices and new reported quarterly financial statements.
Revenue score: 4.0
- Business has been shrinking at a fast pace. It's been substantially worse when measured against peer companies.
- Dominos Pizza, Inc. business trend stability is run-of-the-mill. The higher the stability, the lower the risk. It looks slightly better than rivals.
Margins score: 7.7
- DPZ profit margins -on goods and services sold- are usually sufficient. They stand slightly better than rival companies.
- Business profit on sales tends to be excellent. It's more than average in relation to competitors.
- Profits on sales made -available to repay debt and purchase properties- are usually good. They remain in good shape compared to peers.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- tend to be very good in relation to total revenues. They're still well ranked against similar companies.
- Profits -before income taxes- are usually very good considering total sales, and remain more than average in relation to rivals.
- Total net profit tends to be very good when confronted to sales. Company stands more than average in relation to comparable firms.
Growth score: 3.0
- Dominos Pizza, Inc. profit -on goods and services sold- has been shrinking. It's been in a very weak position compared to competitors.
- In recent years, earnings -on operations- have been shrinking, which has been worse than most comparable firms.
- Profits -available to repay debt and purchase properties- have been growing at a very low pace, which compares below average when measured against peer enterprises.
- Growth on earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- have been almost stagnant. It turns to be lacking compared to similar stocks.
- In past years, growth on profits -before income taxes- was almost stagnant. It was somewhat worse than rivals.
- In the previous years, growth on total net profit has been almost null, and almost average when measured against peer companies.
- Earnings per share have grown at a very low rhythm in past years. It's been close to average when compared to industry peers.
Miscellaneous score: 7.0
- DPZ had hardly to pay income taxes in relation to profits made in the past years. It's been slightly better than peers.
- The company does not report R&D expenses. It's meaningless to measure in relation to competitors.
- We have insufficient data to estimate how effective is research and development effort. It stands unknown against rival companies.
Profitability score: 10.0
- Dominos Pizza, Inc. usually gets huge returns on the resources it controls. It proves top tier when measured against peer firms.
- Due to insufficient track history, we were unable to estimate typical returns on invested capital (ROIC). They remain undisclosed in relation to similar companies.
- Normal return on equity (ROE) is unavailable at this time, because of not enough yearly inputs to calculate. It ranks unknown against competitors.
- In the past, got huge returns -on the tangible resources it controls-. This metric is usually related to the industry in which operates and combines profitability versus reinvestment needs. It's top tier when measured against comparable enterprises.
Usage of Funds score: 6.8
- DPZ usually uses a slight portion of genuine funds generated to buy or replace property, plant, or equipment. The need for reinvestments is light. It stands top tier when measured against rival firms.
- The company is usually investing in new property, plant, and equipment, to improve its operating capabilities, which is more than average in relation to industry peers.
- In the past twelve months it paid somewhat low dividends, considering the current stock price. It came mediocre against competitors.
- Has increased dividend payments in the past years. Business prospects may have improved. The company has behaved a slight improvement compared to similar firms.
- Dividend payments usually represent a modest portion of genuine funds generation and shouldn't be at risk. Sustainability looks well ranked against comparable companies.
- The company usually significantly reduces the pool of investors, resulting in fewer mouths feeding on the pie of profits. It remains impressive in relation to peer enterprises.
- Repurchase effectiveness metric is very complex. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It stands in good shape compared to rivals.
- The company uses a lot more funds to reward investors than it can genuinely generate, so they're paid out of existing cash or by borrowing money, both of which will eventually reach a limit. Either business improves, or rewards won't keep at current pace. It still looks below average when measured against competitors.
Balance Sheet score: 5.4
- Dominos Pizza, Inc. has not disclosed intangibles assets, so we could not reach a meaningful conclusion on this metric. It happens to be a not known variable when measured with peer companies.
- The company has more short-term resources than short-term obligations. Liquidity concerns shouldn't be an issue. It turns to be a slight improvement compared to similar firms.
- Most resources controlled were provided for with financial debt. Creditors have more claims on the company than shareholders. Unless the company is a financial institution that takes deposits, the situation might be very risky. It remains bottom tier against rival firms.
- Controlled resources can be made into cash within reason, which is quite good for liquidity. It looks great when measured against rivals.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has less than a dollar of cash and short-term receivables. It's lacking compared to peer firms.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has very few cents of cash and equivalents, which is worse than most similar enterprises.
- Usually, sales are on a month credit. It still ranks weak when measured against peers.
- Normally has approximately somewhat less than one month of sales worth in inventory. It comes up as in a weak position compared to competitors.
- On average, it takes approximately two months from the purchase to charging customers. It happens to be worse than most peers.
- On average pays suppliers before a month from the purchase. It ranks below average when measured against industry peers.
- The company pays its suppliers less than one month before charging its customers, so there's little money invested in working capital. It's a disappointment compared to similar companies.
- Net interest expenses consume a portion of usual business earnings, but are bearable. It stands slightly worse than rival firms.
- Business earnings have usually been very low when measured against loans taken. Even significantly cutting back reinvesting in the business, it could take more than ten years to repay the obligations with current profitability. It ranks almost average when measured against comparable enterprises.
- Revenues are quite good in relation to property, plant, and equipment required to operate. This metric is likely dependent on the industry the company operates in. The more property, plant, and equipment used, the more the company must reinvest to fight obsolescence, which usually means less available funds for the shareholders in the long run. It looks impressive in relation to similar firms.
- Resource exploitation is huge considering yearly sales, which is great. This metric is normally tied to the industry where the firm belongs. It's still top-notch against peer companies.
Valuation score: 4.5
- Dominos Pizza, Inc. looks very expensive in relation to profits and financial position. It happens to be similar to competitors.
- Price-to-Tangible-Book-Value is a fairly complex metric. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It remains a disappointment compared to peers.
- In the past twelve months, the company generated some free funds in relation to the stock price, which stands somewhat better than similar companies.
- The company usually generates somewhat more than enough genuine funds to cover up for its business needs. Surplus cash may be used to repay loans, to eventually buy new businesses, or to reward investors. Considering the financial position and stock price, the current valuation might be reasonable. It's still encouraging in relation to industry firms.
- In the past twelve months, the company has slightly rewarded investors, considering both dividends and share on the pie of earnings. It came up rather normal in relation to peer ventures.
- The company is indebted, it should focus on loan repayment. It looks slightly better than similar enterprises.
- Considering the past twelve months, traditional Price-to-Earnings relation is high. Substantial improvement expectations are already in the stock price, which is somewhat risky. It ranks almost average when measured against peer companies.
- Comparing the current stock price with the past twelve-months revenues gives a very high relationship. This is an important metric to check its evolution through time, and to compare to industry peers. It looks in a very weak position compared to rival firms.
- There's no accounting equity, which may be good or bad depending on context. Run again in analytic mode if you want to dig deeper. The company remains bottom tier against peer firms.
- In the past twelve months, the operating business earned little money when compared to the current stock price and financial position. It happens to be more than average in relation to industry peers.
- In an alternate metric of bang for the buck, the company has usually shown a good earnings power ability when measured against the current stock price and financial position. It's still in good shape compared to peer companies.
Total score: 6.0

Company at a glance: Dominos Pizza, Inc. (DPZ)
Sector, industry: Consumer Cyclical, Restaurants
Market Cap: 11.60 billions
Revenues TTM: 3.14 billions
Domino's Pizza, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as a pizza company in the United States and internationally. It operates through three segments: U.S. Stores, International Franchise, and Supply Chain. The company offers pizzas under the Domino's brand name through company-owned and franchised stores. It also provides oven-baked sandwiches, pasta, boneless chicken and chicken wings, bread and dips side items, desserts, and soft drink products. As of January 2, 2022, the company operated approximately 18,800 stores in 90 markets. Domino's Pizza, Inc. was founded in 1960 and is based in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Awarener score: 5.8
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Average), the business stability (Average) and growth (Very poor), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Very good).