
Fundamental analysis: Cintas Corporation (CTAS)
Awarener score: 6.1
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Average), the business stability (Excellent) and growth (Lacking), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Good).
Note: All scores range from 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Conclusions are updated daily with closing stock prices and new reported quarterly financial statements.
Revenue score: 6.5
- Business has been slightly shrinking. It's been similar to peer companies.
- Cintas Corporation business trend stability is excellent. The higher the stability, the lower the risk. It looks better than most rivals.
Margins score: 8.0
- CTAS profit margins -on goods and services sold- are usually good. They stand well ranked against rival companies.
- Business profit on sales tends to be excellent. It's great when measured against competitors.
- Profits on sales made -available to repay debt and purchase properties- are usually very good. They remain in good shape compared to peers.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- tend to be very good in relation to total revenues. They're still better than most similar companies.
- Profits -before income taxes- are usually very good considering total sales, and remain great when measured against rivals.
- Total net profit tends to be very good when confronted to sales. Company stands great when measured against comparable firms.
Growth score: 4.9
- Cintas Corporation profit -on goods and services sold- has been growing at a low pace. It's been lacking compared to competitors.
- In recent years, earnings -on operations- have been growing at a low step, which has been slightly worse than comparable firms.
- Profits -available to repay debt and purchase properties- have been growing at a low pace, which compares below average when measured against peer enterprises.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- have been growing at a slow tempo. It turns to be close to average when compared to similar stocks.
- In past years, profits -before income taxes- grew at a low speed. It was mediocre against rivals.
- In the previous years, growth on total net profit has been very low, and weak when measured against peer companies.
- Earnings per share have grown at a low rhythm in past years. It's been in a weak position compared to industry peers.
Miscellaneous score: 7.0
- CTAS had hardly to pay income taxes in relation to profits made in the past years. It's been somewhat better than peers.
- The company does not report R&D expenses. It's meaningless to measure in relation to competitors.
- We have insufficient data to estimate how effective is research and development effort. It stands unknown against rival companies.
Profitability score: 10.0
- Cintas Corporation usually gets huge returns on the resources it controls. It proves top tier when measured against peer firms.
- The company normally gets huge proceeds -on the resources directly invested in the business-. They remain impressive in relation to similar companies.
- Profitability -in relation to owned resources- is usually paramount. It ranks top tier when measured against competitors.
- In the past, got huge returns -on the tangible resources it controls-. This metric is usually related to the industry in which operates and combines profitability versus reinvestment needs. It's top tier when measured against comparable enterprises.
Usage of Funds score: 6.5
- CTAS usually uses a sparse portion of genuine funds generated to buy or replace property, plant, or equipment. The need for reinvestments is modest. It stands top tier when measured against rival firms.
- The company is usually replacing some proportion of the property, plant, and equipment that gets old, saving part of the funds for something else, which is encouraging in relation to industry peers.
- In the past twelve months it paid low dividends, considering the current stock price. It came mediocre against competitors.
- Has greatly increased dividend payments in the past years. Business prospects are most likely good. The company has behaved excellent in relation to similar firms.
- Dividend payments usually represent a minor portion of genuine funds generation and are most likely safe. Sustainability looks slightly better than comparable companies.
- The company usually neither enlarges nor reduces the pool of investors, resulting in approximately the same mouths feeding on the pie of profits. It remains in good shape compared to peer enterprises.
- Repurchase effectiveness metric is very complex. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It stands a slight improvement compared to rivals.
- The company uses a significant portion of genuine fund generation to reward investors, which can probably be sustained for as long as business doesn't turn sour. It still looks weak when measured against competitors.
Balance Sheet score: 4.4
- Cintas Corporation intangible assets (like brands and goodwill) represent a significant portion of resources controlled, according to accounting books. There could be significant difficulties in liquidating them if the company ever gets in financial distress. It happens to be weak when measured against peer companies.
- The company has roughly double short-term resources than short-term obligations. Liquidity concerns are normally not an issue. It turns to be in good shape compared to similar firms.
- Roughly a third of resources controlled were provided for with financial debt. Creditors have claims on the company. It remains somewhat worse than rival firms.
- Most controlled resources take time to be turned into cash and equivalents, which is somewhat risky. It looks weak when measured against rivals.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has roughly another of cash and short-term receivables. It's lacking compared to peer firms.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has very few cents of cash and equivalents, which is worse than most similar enterprises.
- Usually, sales are on a two-months credit. It still ranks encouraging in relation to peers.
- Normally has approximately four months of sales worth in inventory. It comes up as a disappointment compared to competitors.
- On average, it takes higher than six months from the purchase to charging customers. It happens to be bottom tier against peers.
- On average pays suppliers before a month since the purchase. It ranks weak when measured against industry peers.
- The company pays its suppliers six months or more before charging its customers, so there's abundant money invested in working capital. It's a disappointment compared to similar companies.
- Net interest expenses consume a minor portion of usual business earnings, and are easily bearable. It stands well ranked against rival firms.
- Business earnings have usually been very good when measured against loans taken. Cutting back reinvesting in the business, it could take less than two years to repay the obligations with current profitability. It ranks great when measured against comparable enterprises.
- Revenues are reasonable in relation to property, plant, and equipment required to operate. This metric is likely dependent on the industry the company operates in. The more property, plant, and equipment used, the more the company must reinvest to fight obsolescence, which usually means less available funds for the shareholders in the long run. It looks in a weak position compared to similar firms.
- Resource exploitation is very good when yearly sales are considered. This metric is normally tied to the industry where the firm belongs. It's still slightly better than peer companies.
Valuation score: 4.5
- Cintas Corporation looks very expensive in relation to profits and financial position. It happens to be weak when measured against competitors.
- Price-to-Tangible-Book-Value is a fairly complex metric. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It remains in a very weak position compared to peers.
- In the past twelve months, the company generated some free funds in relation to the stock price, which stands slightly worse than similar companies.
- The company usually generates somewhat more than enough genuine funds to cover up for its business needs. Surplus cash may be used to repay loans, to eventually buy new businesses, or to reward investors. Considering the financial position and stock price, the current valuation might be reasonable. It's still below average when measured against industry firms.
- In the past twelve months, the company has barely rewarded investors, considering both dividends and share on the pie of earnings. It came up a slight improvement compared to peer ventures.
- The company has neither net debt nor net cash. It may borrow extra money if it wishes so, or start cumulating cash for future uses. It looks well ranked against similar enterprises.
- Considering the past twelve months, traditional Price-to-Earnings relation is very high. A lot of improvement expectations are already in the stock price, which is risky. It ranks substantially worse when measured against peer companies.
- Comparing the current stock price with the past twelve-months revenues gives a very large relationship. The stock price might rely more on expectations and resources controlled than on anything else. It looks a disappointment compared to rival firms.
- The relation between the stock price and accounting book value is extremely high, which may be good or bad depending on context. Run again in analytic mode if you want to dig deeper. The company remains worse than most peer firms.
- In the past twelve months, the operating business earned little money when compared to the current stock price and financial position. It happens to be below average when measured against industry peers.
- In an alternate metric of bang for the buck, the company has usually shown a modest earnings power ability when measured against the current stock price and financial position. It's still rather normal in relation to peer companies.
Total score: 6.5

Company at a glance: Cintas Corporation (CTAS)
Sector, industry: Industrials, Specialty Business Services
Market Cap: 48.98 billions
Revenues TTM: 8.61 billions
Cintas Corporation provides corporate identity uniforms and related business services primarily in the United States, Canada, and Latin America. It operates through Uniform Rental and Facility Services, First Aid and Safety Services, and All Other segments. The company rents and services uniforms and other garments, including flame resistant clothing, mats, mops and shop towels, and other ancillary items; and provides restroom cleaning services and supplies, as well as sells uniforms. It also offers first aid and safety services, and fire protection products and services. The company provides its products and services through its distribution network and local delivery routes, or local representatives to small service and manufacturing companies, as well as major corporations. Cintas Corporation was founded in 1968 and is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio.
Awarener score: 6.1
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Average), the business stability (Excellent) and growth (Lacking), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Good).