
Fundamental analysis: Crocs, Inc. (CROX)
Awarener score: 7.3
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Very good), the business stability (Modest) and growth (Excellent), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Modest).
Note: All scores range from 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Conclusions are updated daily with closing stock prices and new reported quarterly financial statements.
Revenue score: 7.0
- Business has been growing at an excellent pace. It's been top tier when measured against peer companies.
- Crocs, Inc. business trend isn't so stable. The higher the stability, the lower the risk. It looks slightly worse than rivals.
Margins score: 8.0
- CROX profit margins -on goods and services sold- are usually good. They stand better than most rival companies.
- Business profit on sales tends to be excellent. It's top tier when measured against competitors.
- Profits on sales made -available to repay debt and purchase properties- are usually good. They remain impressive in relation to peers.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- tend to be very good in relation to total revenues. They're still top-notch against similar companies.
- Profits -before income taxes- are usually very good considering total sales, and remain great when measured against rivals.
- Total net profit tends to be excellent when confronted to sales. Company stands top tier when measured against comparable firms.
Growth score: 9.0
- Crocs, Inc. profit -on goods and services sold- has been growing at a very good pace. It's been impressive in relation to competitors.
- In recent years, earnings -on operations- have been growing at a very good step, which has been better than most comparable firms.
- Profits -available to repay debt and purchase properties- have been growing at an excellent pace, which compares more than average in relation to peer enterprises.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- have been growing at an extremely fast tempo. It turns to be excellent in relation to similar stocks.
- In past years, profits -before income taxes- grew at an excellent speed. It was somewhat better than rivals.
- In the previous years, growth trend on total net profit has been excellent, and encouraging in relation to peer companies.
- Earnings per share have grown at an extremely fast rhythm in past years. It's been a slight improvement compared to industry peers.
Miscellaneous score: 9.0
- CROX managed to pay no income taxes on profits made in the past years, sometimes even got a credit. It's been somewhat better than peers.
- The company does not report R&D expenses. It's meaningless to measure in relation to competitors.
- We have insufficient data to estimate how effective is research and development effort. It stands unknown against rival companies.
Profitability score: 10.0
- Crocs, Inc. usually gets huge returns on the resources it controls. It proves more than average in relation to peer firms.
- The company normally gets huge proceeds -on the resources directly invested in the business-. They remain in good shape compared to similar companies.
- Profitability -in relation to owned resources- is usually paramount. It ranks top tier when measured against competitors.
- In the past, got huge returns -on the tangible resources it controls-. This metric is usually related to the industry in which operates and combines profitability versus reinvestment needs. It's top tier when measured against comparable enterprises.
Usage of Funds score: 5.4
- CROX usually uses a modest portion of genuine funds generated to buy or replace property, plant, or equipment. The need for reinvestments isn't too high. It stands top tier when measured against rival firms.
- The company is usually investing in new property, plant, and equipment, to improve its operating capabilities, which is more than average in relation to industry peers.
- In the past twelve months the stock paid no dividends. It came bottom tier against competitors.
- Has stopped or virtually stopped paying dividends. Unless they were a special one-shot payment, the company could be enduring difficult times. The company has behaved a disappointment compared to similar firms.
- As no dividends are paid, it is useless trying to estimate their sustainability in time. Sustainability looks not applicable in regard to comparable companies.
- The company usually reduces the pool of investors, resulting in fewer mouths feeding on the pie of profits. It remains in good shape compared to peer enterprises.
- Repurchase effectiveness metric is very complex. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It stands in good shape compared to rivals.
- The company uses a large portion of genuine fund generation to reward investors, which can probably be sustained for as long as business doesn't turn sour. It still looks similar to competitors.
Balance Sheet score: 4.6
- Crocs, Inc. intangible assets (like brands and goodwill) represent a huge portion of resources controlled, according to accounting books. There could be major difficulties in liquidating them if the company ever gets in financial distress. It happens to be last-in-rank when measured against peer companies.
- The company has roughly double short-term resources than short-term obligations. Liquidity concerns are normally not an issue. It turns to be in a weak position compared to similar firms.
- A substantial part of resources controlled were provided for with financial debt. Creditors have as many claims on the company as shareholders. The situation is somewhat risky. It remains worse than most rival firms.
- Most controlled resources might be only slowly turned into cash and equivalents, which is risky. It looks last-in-rank when measured against rivals.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has roughly another of cash and short-term receivables. It's in a very weak position compared to peer firms.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has few cents of cash and equivalents, which is mediocre against similar enterprises.
- Usually, sales are on a month and a half credit. It still ranks almost average when measured against peers.
- Normally has approximately three months of sales worth in inventory. It comes up as a slight improvement compared to competitors.
- On average, it takes higher than five months from the purchase to charging customers. It happens to be well ranked against peers.
- On average pays suppliers two months after the purchase. It ranks almost average when measured against industry peers.
- The company pays its suppliers roughly three months before charging its customers, so there's sufficient money invested in working capital. It's in good shape compared to similar companies.
- Net interest expenses consume a significant portion of usual business earnings, but are mostly bearable. It stands somewhat worse than rival firms.
- Business earnings have usually been low when measured against loans taken. Even cutting back reinvesting in the business, it could take more than seven years to repay the obligations with current profitability. It ranks below average when measured against comparable enterprises.
- Revenues are very good in relation to property, plant, and equipment required to operate. This metric is likely dependent on the industry the company operates in. Low property, plant, and equipment requirements allows the company to keep more money to reward stockholders in the long run. It looks in good shape compared to similar firms.
- Resource exploitation is very good when yearly sales are considered. This metric is normally tied to the industry where the firm belongs. It's still bottom tier against peer companies.
Valuation score: 5.9
- Crocs, Inc. looks reasonable in relation to profits and financial position. It happens to be similar to competitors.
- Price-to-Tangible-Book-Value is a fairly complex metric. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It remains a disappointment compared to peers.
- In the past twelve months, the company generated some good free funds in relation to the stock price, which stands slightly better than similar companies.
- The company usually generates more than enough genuine funds to cover up for its business needs. Surplus cash may be used to repay loans, to eventually buy new businesses, or to reward investors. Considering the financial position and stock price, at the current price the share might be interesting. It's still similar to industry firms.
- In the past twelve months, the company has slightly enlarged the pool of investors by issuing new shares. The pie of earnings will now be split among a little more stockholders. It came up a disappointment compared to peer ventures.
- The company is somewhat indebted, loan repayment needs to be taken into account. It looks slightly worse than similar enterprises.
- Considering the past twelve months, traditional Price-to-Earnings relation might be reasonable. It ranks encouraging in relation to peer companies.
- Comparing the current stock price with the past twelve-months revenues gives a roughly two to one relationship. This is an important metric to check its evolution through time, and to compare to industry peers. It looks in a very weak position compared to rival firms.
- The relation between the stock price and accounting book value is really high, which may be good or bad depending on context. Run again in analytic mode if you want to dig deeper. The company remains mediocre against peer firms.
- In the past twelve months, the operating business earned good money when compared to the current stock price and financial position. It happens to be encouraging in relation to industry peers.
- In an alternate metric of bang for the buck, the company has usually shown a very good earnings power ability when measured against the current stock price and financial position. It's still rather normal in relation to peer companies.
Total score: 7.4

Company at a glance: Crocs, Inc. (CROX)
Sector, industry: Consumer Cyclical, Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap: 6.62 billions
Revenues TTM: 3.78 billions
Crocs, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, manufactures, markets, and distributes casual lifestyle footwear and accessories for men, women, and children. It offers various footwear products, including clogs, sandals, slides, flip-flops, boots, flats, wedges, platforms, socks, shoe charms, loafers, sneakers, and slippers under the Crocs brand name. The company sells its products in approximately 85 countries through wholesalers, retail stores, e-commerce sites, and third-party marketplaces. As of December 31, 2021, it had 193 outlet stores, 107 retail stores, 373 company-operated stores, 73 kiosks and store-in-stores, and 14 company-operated e-commerce sites. The company serves in the Americas, the Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Crocs, Inc. was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Broomfield, Colorado.
Awarener score: 7.3
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Very good), the business stability (Modest) and growth (Excellent), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Modest).