
Fundamental analysis: Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK)
Awarener score: 6.8
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Very good), the business stability (Very poor) and growth (Superb), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Poor).
Note: All scores range from 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Conclusions are updated daily with closing stock prices and new reported quarterly financial statements.
Revenue score: 6.0
- Business has been growing at an extremely fast pace. It's been great when measured against peer companies.
- Comstock Resources, Inc. business varies frequently, ups and downs are normal. It's risky. It looks somewhat worse than rivals.
Margins score: 8.0
- CRK profit margins -on goods and services sold- are usually good. They stand somewhat better than rival companies.
- Business profit on sales tends to be huge. It's top tier when measured against competitors.
- Profits on sales made -available to repay debt and purchase properties- are usually huge. They remain excellent in relation to peers.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- tend to be excellent in relation to total revenues. They're still better than most similar companies.
- Profits -before income taxes- are usually sufficient considering total sales, and remain encouraging in relation to rivals.
- Total net profit tends to be sufficient when confronted to sales. Company stands encouraging in relation to comparable firms.
Growth score: 4.9
- Comstock Resources, Inc. profit -on goods and services sold- has been growing at an extremely fast pace. It's been in good shape compared to competitors.
- In recent years, earnings -on operations- have been growing at an extremely fast step, which has been slightly better than comparable firms.
- Profits -available to repay debt and purchase properties- have been growing at an extremely fast pace, which compares more than average in relation to peer enterprises.
- In the previous years, the firm couldn't always make a profit -before income taxes and interests on loans taken-. It turns to be a disappointment compared to similar stocks.
- In past years, at least once the company lost money -before income taxes-. It was bottom tier against rivals.
- In the previous years, the firm had at least a total net loss, and last-in-rank when measured against peer companies.
- The company lost money at least once in the past years. It's been a disappointment compared to industry peers.
Miscellaneous score: 4.0
- CRK had to pay substantial income taxes in relation to profits made in the past years. It's been mediocre against peers.
- The company does not report R&D expenses. It's meaningless to measure in relation to competitors.
- We have insufficient data to estimate how effective is research and development effort. It stands unknown against rival companies.
Profitability score: 7.5
- Comstock Resources, Inc. usually gets very good returns on the resources it controls. It proves encouraging in relation to peer firms.
- The company normally gets very good proceeds -on the resources directly invested in the business-. They remain a slight improvement compared to similar companies.
- There's usually some profitability -in relation to owned resources-. It ranks encouraging in relation to competitors.
- In the past, got very good returns -on the tangible resources it controls-. This metric is usually related to the industry in which operates and combines profitability versus reinvestment needs. It's encouraging in relation to comparable enterprises.
Usage of Funds score: 6.0
- CRK usually uses almost no genuine funds generated to buy or replace property, plant, or equipment. The need for reinvestments is non-significant. It stands encouraging in relation to rival firms.
- The company is usually somewhat investing in new property, plant, and equipment, to improve its operating capabilities, which is weak when measured against industry peers.
- In the past twelve months it paid low dividends, considering the current stock price. It came mediocre against competitors.
- Has somewhat increased dividend payments in the past years. Business prospects may have improved. The company has behaved lacking compared to similar firms.
- Dividend payments usually represent a slight portion of genuine funds generation and are most likely safe. Sustainability looks well ranked against comparable companies.
- The company has greatly enlarged the pool of investors in previous years, resulting in more mouths feeding on the pie of profits. It remains a disappointment compared to peer enterprises.
- We are not sure on the effectiveness of the company when repurchasing shares, as there were not enough numbers to crunch. It stands unidentified against rivals.
- We do not have sufficient data to comment on buybacks and their sustainability. It still looks dubious against competitors.
Balance Sheet score: 6.0
- Comstock Resources, Inc. intangible assets (like brands and goodwill) represent a small portion of resources controlled, according to accounting books. It isn't that a significant risk of liquidating them if the company ever gets in financial distress. It happens to be last-in-rank when measured against peer companies.
- The company has somewhat lower short-term resources than short-term obligations. Unless it's part of the business model, there might some liquidity concerns. It turns to be close to average when compared to similar firms.
- A significant part of resources controlled were provided for with financial debt. Creditors have almost as many claims on the company as shareholders. It remains mediocre against rival firms.
- Controlled resources take time to be turned into cash and equivalents, which is somewhat risky. It looks last-in-rank when measured against rivals.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has few cents of cash and short-term receivables. It's a disappointment compared to peer firms.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has very few cents of cash and equivalents, which is mediocre against similar enterprises.
- Usually, sales are on cash. It still ranks great when measured against peers.
- Normally has no inventories. It comes up as impressive in relation to competitors.
- On average, it takes less than one month from the purchase to charging customers. It happens to be top-notch against peers.
- On average pays suppliers approximately four months or higher after the purchase. It ranks great when measured against industry peers.
- The company charges its customers long before it must pay its suppliers, so the more it sales, the more free funds it gets. It's excellent in relation to similar companies.
- Net interest expenses consume a significant portion of usual business earnings, but are mostly bearable. It stands slightly worse than rival firms.
- Business earnings have usually been good when measured against loans taken. Cutting back reinvesting in the business, it could take less than three years to repay the obligations with current profitability. It ranks similar to comparable enterprises.
- Last twelve months revenues were non-significant in relation to fixed assets. The company must improve income to take advantage of used resources. It looks close to average when compared to similar firms.
- Resource exploitation is quite good when yearly sales are considered. This metric is normally tied to the industry where the firm belongs. It's still slightly better than peer companies.
Valuation score: 7.5
- Comstock Resources, Inc. looks extremely cheap in relation to profits and financial position. It happens to be more than average in relation to competitors.
- Price-to-Tangible-Book-Value is a fairly complex metric. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It remains rather normal in relation to peers.
- In the past twelve months, the company generated excellent free funds in relation to the stock price, which stands somewhat better than similar companies.
- The company usually generates reasonably more than enough genuine funds to cover up for its business needs. Surplus cash may be used to repay loans, to eventually buy new businesses, or to reward investors. Considering the financial position and stock price, the current valuation might be fair. It's still similar to industry firms.
- In the past twelve months, the company has significantly enlarged the pool of investors by issuing new shares. Future profits need to be high enough to justify the measure, as the pie of earnings will now be split among numerous more stockholders. It came up lacking compared to peer ventures.
- The company is largely indebted. It should focus on loan repayment before rewarding stockholders. It looks worse than most similar enterprises.
- Considering the past twelve months, traditional Price-to-Earnings relation looks extremely cheap. Possible reasons are that the market might be betting current earnings will be very hard to sustain through time, or that the company has very high fund needs, a weak financial position, or that earnings aren't representative. If that isn't the case, the stock price could be extremely attractive. It ranks great when measured against peer companies.
- Comparing the current stock price with the past twelve-months revenues gives a not far from one-to-one relationship. This is an important metric to check its evolution through time, and to compare to industry peers. It looks in good shape compared to rival firms.
- The relation between the stock price and accounting book value might be reasonable. It's important both to check this metric through time and to compare it with rival companies. The company remains somewhat better than peer firms.
- In the past twelve months, the operating business earned huge money when compared to the current stock price and financial position. It happens to be more than average in relation to industry peers.
- In an alternate metric of bang for the buck, the company has usually shown an excellent earnings power ability when measured against the current stock price and financial position. Further analysis is recommended, as the stock might currently be undervalued. It's still excellent in relation to peer companies.
Total score: 6.2

Company at a glance: Comstock Resources, Inc. (CRK)
Sector, industry: Energy, Oil & Gas E&P
Market Cap: 2.76 billions
Revenues TTM: 3.63 billions
Comstock Resources, Inc., an independent energy company, engages in the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas primarily in North Louisiana and East Texas, the United States. As of December 31, 2021, the company had 6.1 trillion cubic feet of the natural gas equivalent of proved reserves. It also owns interests in 2,557 producing oil and natural gas wells. The company was incorporated in 1919 and is headquartered in Frisco, Texas.
Awarener score: 6.8
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Very good), the business stability (Very poor) and growth (Superb), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Poor).