
Fundamental analysis: Berry Global Group, Inc. (BERY)
Awarener score: 7.8
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Very good), the business stability (Average) and growth (Good), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Superb).
Note: All scores range from 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Conclusions are updated daily with closing stock prices and new reported quarterly financial statements.
Revenue score: 6.5
- Business has been growing at a good pace. It's been great when measured against peer companies.
- Berry Global Group, Inc. business trend stability is run-of-the-mill. The higher the stability, the lower the risk. It looks mediocre against rivals.
Margins score: 5.7
- BERY profit margins -on goods and services sold- are usually very poor. They stand somewhat worse than rival companies.
- Business profit on sales tends to be good. It's similar to competitors.
- Profits on sales made -available to repay debt and purchase properties- are usually sufficient. They remain close to average when compared to peers.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- tend to be sufficient in relation to total revenues. They're still mediocre against similar companies.
- Profits -before income taxes- are usually sufficient considering total sales, and remain similar to rivals.
- Total net profit tends to be sufficient when confronted to sales. Company stands similar to comparable firms.
Growth score: 7.0
- Berry Global Group, Inc. profit -on goods and services sold- has been growing at a very good pace. It's been excellent in relation to competitors.
- In recent years, earnings -on operations- have been growing at a low step, which has been slightly worse than comparable firms.
- Profits -available to repay debt and purchase properties- have been growing at a good pace, which compares similar to peer enterprises.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- have been growing at an extremely fast tempo. It turns to be in good shape compared to similar stocks.
- In past years, profits -before income taxes- grew at a normal speed. It was slightly worse than rivals.
- In the previous years, growth on total net profit has been average, and almost average when measured against peer companies.
- Earnings per share have grown at a good rhythm in past years. It's been close to average when compared to industry peers.
Miscellaneous score: 6.0
- BERY had to pay sparse income taxes in relation to profits made in the past years. It's been well ranked against peers.
- The company does not report R&D expenses. It's meaningless to measure in relation to competitors.
- We have insufficient data to estimate how effective is research and development effort. It stands unknown against rival companies.
Profitability score: 7.8
- Berry Global Group, Inc. usually gets good returns on the resources it controls. It proves substantially worse when measured against peer firms.
- The company normally gets sufficient proceeds -on the resources directly invested in the business-. They remain in a weak position compared to similar companies.
- Profitability -in relation to owned resources- is usually paramount. It ranks great when measured against competitors.
- In the past, got very good returns -on the tangible resources it controls-. This metric is usually related to the industry in which operates and combines profitability versus reinvestment needs. It's below average when measured against comparable enterprises.
Usage of Funds score: 7.5
- BERY usually uses a large portion of genuine funds generated to buy or replace property, plant, or equipment. The need for reinvestments is large. It stands below average when measured against rival firms.
- The company is usually replacing the property, plant, and equipment that gets old, keeping its operating capabilities up to date, which is below average when measured against industry peers.
- In the past twelve months it paid very little dividends, considering the current stock price. It came worse than most competitors.
- Has recently started or restarted paying dividends to stockholders. Business prospects are most likely good. The company has behaved impressive in relation to similar firms.
- Dividend payments usually represent a non-significant portion of genuine funds generation and are likely very safe. Sustainability looks top-notch against comparable companies.
- The company usually significantly reduces the pool of investors, resulting in fewer mouths feeding on the pie of profits. It remains in good shape compared to peer enterprises.
- Repurchase effectiveness metric is very complex. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It stands impressive in relation to rivals.
- The company uses a low portion of genuine fund generation to reward investors, which can most likely be sustained. It still looks great when measured against competitors.
Balance Sheet score: 5.3
- Berry Global Group, Inc. intangible assets (like brands and goodwill) represent a huge portion of resources controlled, according to accounting books. There could be major difficulties in liquidating them if the company ever gets in financial distress. It happens to be last-in-rank when measured against peer companies.
- The company has roughly double short-term resources than short-term obligations. Liquidity concerns are normally not an issue. It turns to be rather normal in relation to similar firms.
- A substantial part of resources controlled were provided for with financial debt. Creditors have as many claims on the company as shareholders. The situation is somewhat risky. It remains worse than most rival firms.
- Most controlled resources take time to be turned into cash and equivalents, which is somewhat risky. It looks weak when measured against rivals.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has roughly another of cash and short-term receivables. It's a slight improvement compared to peer firms.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has roughly half of cash and equivalents, which is somewhat better than similar enterprises.
- Usually, sales are on a month and a half credit. It still ranks almost average when measured against peers.
- Normally has no inventories. It comes up as impressive in relation to competitors.
- On average, it takes approximately two months from the purchase to charging customers. It happens to be better than most peers.
- On average pays suppliers longer than two months after the purchase. It ranks encouraging in relation to industry peers.
- The company charges its customers before it must pay its suppliers, so the more it sales, the more free funds it gets. It's impressive in relation to similar companies.
- Net interest expenses consume a significant portion of usual business earnings, but are mostly bearable. It stands worse than most rival firms.
- Business earnings have usually been low when measured against loans taken. Even cutting back reinvesting in the business, it could take more than seven years to repay the obligations with current profitability. It ranks substantially worse when measured against comparable enterprises.
- Revenues are somewhat low in relation to property, plant, and equipment required to operate. This metric is likely dependent on the industry the company operates in. The more property, plant, and equipment used, the more the company must reinvest to fight obsolescence, which usually means less available funds for the shareholders in the long run. It looks lacking compared to similar firms.
- Resource exploitation is very good when yearly sales are considered. This metric is normally tied to the industry where the firm belongs. It's still somewhat worse than peer companies.
Valuation score: 6.3
- Berry Global Group, Inc. looks somewhat expensive in relation to profits and financial position. It happens to be below average when measured against competitors.
- Price-to-Tangible-Book-Value is a fairly complex metric. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It remains a disappointment compared to peers.
- In the past twelve months, the company generated some slightly better free funds in relation to the stock price, which stands slightly worse than similar companies.
- The company usually generates more than enough genuine funds to cover up for its business needs. Surplus cash may be used to repay loans, to eventually buy new businesses, or to reward investors. Considering the financial position and stock price, at the current price the share might be interesting. It's still more than average in relation to industry firms.
- In the past twelve months, the company has significantly rewarded investors, considering both dividends and share on the pie of earnings. It came up excellent in relation to peer ventures.
- The company is largely indebted. It should focus on loan repayment before rewarding stockholders. It looks worse than most similar enterprises.
- Considering the past twelve months, traditional Price-to-Earnings relation might be reasonable. It ranks more than average in relation to peer companies.
- Comparing the current stock price with the past twelve-months revenues gives a not far from one-to-one relationship. This is an important metric to check its evolution through time, and to compare to industry peers. It looks a slight improvement compared to rival firms.
- The relation between the stock price and accounting book value is high, which may be good or bad depending on context. Run again in analytic mode if you want to dig deeper. The company remains slightly better than peer firms.
- In the past twelve months, the operating business earned good money when compared to the current stock price and financial position. It happens to be similar to industry peers.
- In an alternate metric of bang for the buck, the company has usually shown a good earnings power ability when measured against the current stock price and financial position. It's still in a weak position compared to peer companies.
Total score: 6.5

Company at a glance: Berry Global Group, Inc. (BERY)
Sector, industry: Consumer Cyclical, Packaging & Containers
Market Cap: 7.03 billions
Revenues TTM: 13.49 billions
Berry Global Group, Inc. manufactures and supplies non-woven, flexible, and rigid products in consumer and industrial end markets. The company operates through Consumer Packaging International; Consumer Packaging North America; Engineered Materials; and Health, Hygiene & Specialties segments. The Consumer Packaging International segment offers closures and dispensing systems, pharmaceutical devices and packaging, bottles and canisters, containers, and technical components. The Consumer Packaging North America segment provides containers and pails, foodservice products, closures and overcaps, bottles and prescription vials, and tubes. The Engineered Materials segment offers stretch and shrink, converter, food and consumer, and agriculture films, as well as institutional can liners and retail bags. The Health, Hygiene & Specialties segment provides healthcare, hygiene, specialties, and tapes. Berry Global Group, Inc. sells its products through direct sales force of professionals and distributors in the United States, Canada, Europe, and internationally. The company was formerly known as Berry Plastics Group, Inc. and changed its name to Berry Global Group, Inc. in April 2017. Berry Global Group, Inc. was founded in 1967 and is based in Evansville, Indiana.
Awarener score: 7.8
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Very good), the business stability (Average) and growth (Good), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Superb).