
Fundamental analysis: Amcor plc (AMCR)
Awarener score: 7.8
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Very good), the business stability (unknown) and growth (Modest), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Superb).
Note: All scores range from 1 (worst) to 10 (best). Conclusions are updated daily with closing stock prices and new reported quarterly financial statements.
Revenue score: 5.0
- Business growth has been almost stagnant. It's been similar to peer companies.
- Amcor plc business stability could not be estimated, due to insufficient input data. It looks we cannot compare it to rivals.
Margins score: 6.0
- AMCR profit margins -on goods and services sold- are usually very poor. They stand mediocre against rival companies.
- Business profit on sales tends to be good. It's similar to competitors.
- Profits on sales made -available to repay debt and purchase properties- are usually sufficient. They remain rather normal in relation to peers.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- tend to be sufficient in relation to total revenues. They're still somewhat better than similar companies.
- Profits -before income taxes- are usually good considering total sales, and remain more than average in relation to rivals.
- Total net profit tends to be good when confronted to sales. Company stands great when measured against comparable firms.
Growth score: 5.4
- Amcor plc profit -on goods and services sold- has been growing at a very low pace. It's been close to average when compared to competitors.
- In recent years, earnings -on operations- have been growing at a very low step, which has been somewhat worse than comparable firms.
- Profits -available to repay debt and purchase properties- have been growing at a very low pace, which compares weak when measured against peer enterprises.
- Earnings -before income taxes and interests on loans taken- have been growing at a slow tempo. It turns to be lacking compared to similar stocks.
- In past years, profits -before income taxes- grew at a normal speed. It was slightly better than rivals.
- In the previous years, growth trend on total net profit has been good, and encouraging in relation to peer companies.
- Earnings per share have grown at a very good rhythm in past years. It's been a slight improvement compared to industry peers.
Miscellaneous score: 8.0
- AMCR had to pay some income taxes in relation to profits made in the past years. It's been slightly better than peers.
- Research and development expenses hardly consume a portion of revenues. It's weak when measured against competitors.
- The company shows very good business growth in relation to research and development efforts. It stands in a very weak position compared to rival companies.
Profitability score: 8.5
- Amcor plc usually gets very good returns on the resources it controls. It proves almost average when measured against peer firms.
- The company normally gets very good proceeds -on the resources directly invested in the business-. They remain close to average when compared to similar companies.
- There's usually excellent profitability -in relation to owned resources-. It ranks similar to competitors.
- In the past, got excellent returns -on the tangible resources it controls-. This metric is usually related to the industry in which operates and combines profitability versus reinvestment needs. It's similar to comparable enterprises.
Usage of Funds score: 6.4
- AMCR usually uses a significant portion of genuine funds generated to buy or replace property, plant, or equipment. The need for reinvestments is abundant. It stands similar to rival firms.
- The company is usually replacing most of the property, plant, and equipment that gets old, and saving a little funds for something else, which is substantially worse when measured against industry peers.
- In the past twelve months it paid very good dividends, considering the current stock price. It came well ranked against competitors.
- Has increased dividend payments in the past years. Business prospects may have improved. The company has behaved a slight improvement compared to similar firms.
- The company usually uses a large portion of genuine funds generated to pay dividends. There could be some concerns on sustainability if business takes a dive. Sustainability looks worse than most comparable companies.
- The company usually significantly reduces the pool of investors, resulting in fewer mouths feeding on the pie of profits. It remains impressive in relation to peer enterprises.
- Repurchase effectiveness metric is very complex. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It stands impressive in relation to rivals.
- The company uses somewhat more funds to reward investors than it can genuinely generate, so some part of them is paid out of existing cash or by borrowing money, both of which will eventually reach a limit. Either business somewhat improves, or rewards will probably not be sustained at this pace. It still looks substantially worse when measured against competitors.
Balance Sheet score: 4.9
- Amcor plc intangible assets (like brands and goodwill) represent a very large portion of resources controlled, according to accounting books. There could be major difficulties in liquidating them if the company ever gets in financial distress. It happens to be substantially worse when measured against peer companies.
- The company has somewhat more short-term resources than short-term obligations. Liquidity concerns might not be that important. It turns to be in a weak position compared to similar firms.
- A significant part of resources controlled were provided for with financial debt. Creditors have almost as many claims on the company as shareholders. It remains slightly better than rival firms.
- Most controlled resources take time to be turned into cash and equivalents, which is somewhat risky. It looks below average when measured against rivals.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has almost another of cash and short-term receivables. It's in a weak position compared to peer firms.
- For every dollar of short-term obligations, the company has very few cents of cash and equivalents, which is mediocre against similar enterprises.
- Usually, sales are on a two-months credit. It still ranks below average when measured against peers.
- Normally has no inventories. It comes up as impressive in relation to competitors.
- On average, it takes approximately two months from the purchase to charging customers. It happens to be better than most peers.
- Pays suppliers mostly in cash. It ranks last-in-rank when measured against industry peers.
- The company pays its suppliers roughly two months before charging its customers, so there's some money invested in working capital. It's a slight improvement compared to similar companies.
- Net interest expenses consume a non-significant portion of usual business earnings, and are therefore extremely easily to bear. It stands better than most rival firms.
- Business earnings have usually been quite good when measured against loans taken. Cutting back reinvesting in the business, it could take around three years to repay the obligations with current profitability. It ranks encouraging in relation to comparable enterprises.
- Revenues are modest in relation to property, plant, and equipment required to operate. This metric is likely dependent on the industry the company operates in. The more property, plant, and equipment used, the more the company must reinvest to fight obsolescence, which usually means less available funds for the shareholders in the long run. It looks a slight improvement compared to similar firms.
- Resource exploitation is very good when yearly sales are considered. This metric is normally tied to the industry where the firm belongs. It's still slightly worse than peer companies.
Valuation score: 6.3
- Amcor plc looks somewhat expensive in relation to profits and financial position. It happens to be almost average when measured against competitors.
- Price-to-Tangible-Book-Value is a fairly complex metric. Run again in analytical mode if you're interested in a technical explanation. It remains a disappointment compared to peers.
- In the past twelve months, the company generated excellent free funds in relation to the stock price, which stands top-notch against similar companies.
- The company usually generates more than enough genuine funds to cover up for its business needs. Surplus cash may be used to repay loans, to eventually buy new businesses, or to reward investors. Considering the financial position and stock price, at the current price the share might be interesting. It's still similar to industry firms.
- In the past twelve months, the company has significantly rewarded investors, considering both dividends and share on the pie of earnings. It came up excellent in relation to peer ventures.
- The company is indebted, it should focus on loan repayment. It looks somewhat better than similar enterprises.
- Considering the past twelve months, traditional Price-to-Earnings relation might be more or less reasonable, but hardly cheap. It ranks below average when measured against peer companies.
- Comparing the current stock price with the past twelve-months revenues gives a more than one-to-one relationship. This is an important metric to check its evolution through time, and to compare to industry peers. It looks in a weak position compared to rival firms.
- The relation between the stock price and accounting book value is significantly high, which may be good or bad depending on context. Run again in analytic mode if you want to dig deeper. The company remains worse than most peer firms.
- In the past twelve months, the operating business earned some money when compared to the current stock price and financial position. It happens to be substantially worse when measured against industry peers.
- In an alternate metric of bang for the buck, the company has usually shown a very good earnings power ability when measured against the current stock price and financial position. It's still lacking compared to peer companies.
Total score: 6.3

Company at a glance: Amcor plc (AMCR)
Sector, industry: Consumer Cyclical, Packaging & Containers
Market Cap: 14.41 billions
Revenues TTM: 14.93 billions
Amcor plc develops, produces, and sells packaging products in Europe, North America, Latin America, Africa, and the Asia Pacific regions. The company operates through two segments, Flexibles and Rigid Packaging. The Flexibles segment provides flexible and film packaging products in the food and beverage, medical and pharmaceutical, fresh produce, snack food, personal care, and other industries. The Rigid Packaging segment offers rigid containers for a range of beverage and food products, including carbonated soft drinks, water, juices, sports drinks, milk-based beverages, spirits and beer, sauces, dressings, spreads, and personal care items; and plastic caps for various applications. The company sells its products primarily through its direct sales force. Amcor plc was incorporated in 2018 and is headquartered in Zürich, Switzerland.
Awarener score: 7.8
Conclusion
The higher the Awarener score, the more bang you get for the buck. It measures how much genuine funds the company generates for the stock price paid (Very good), the business stability (unknown) and growth (Modest), and the company's inclination to return cash to the stockholders (Superb).